Difference between revisions of "GMn/nTPE analysis meeting 2023 05 26"
From SBS wiki
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Discussion on "path to results": [https://sbs.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/File:GMn_nTPE_analysis_roadmap_20230526.pdf "Guide"] | * Discussion on "path to results": [https://sbs.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/File:GMn_nTPE_analysis_roadmap_20230526.pdf "Guide"] | ||
* Calibrations and organization for "pass 2" | * Calibrations and organization for "pass 2" | ||
− | + | ||
'''Minutes:''' | '''Minutes:''' | ||
+ | * Path to results: | ||
+ | ** Selection: boils down to fitting the "DeltaX" distributions (need more details): | ||
+ | *** Question on how to account for p, n detection efficiency: short answer: Efficiency close to 1 and very similar for p, n; (comes as a factor when trying to estimate sigma, not N) | ||
+ | ** Estimation of correcting factor ("f_corr"): heavy use of Monte Carlo (addresses the question on "what MC should be used for") | ||
+ | ** Estimation of physics quantity and uncertainties: simple algebra using Nen,ep, f_corr | ||
+ | * Calibrations: Arun will give an update next week. | ||
+ | * Anu: short update on HCal calibration with pi-N; |
Latest revision as of 12:25, 26 May 2023
Back to main analysis meeting page
Agenda:
- Discussion on "path to results": "Guide"
- Calibrations and organization for "pass 2"
Minutes:
- Path to results:
- Selection: boils down to fitting the "DeltaX" distributions (need more details):
- Question on how to account for p, n detection efficiency: short answer: Efficiency close to 1 and very similar for p, n; (comes as a factor when trying to estimate sigma, not N)
- Estimation of correcting factor ("f_corr"): heavy use of Monte Carlo (addresses the question on "what MC should be used for")
- Estimation of physics quantity and uncertainties: simple algebra using Nen,ep, f_corr
- Selection: boils down to fitting the "DeltaX" distributions (need more details):
- Calibrations: Arun will give an update next week.
- Anu: short update on HCal calibration with pi-N;