Difference between revisions of "GMn/nTPE analysis meeting 2023 11 10"
From SBS wiki
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Rotating students update: | * Rotating students update: | ||
** Zeke:[https://sbs.jlab.org/DocDB/0004/000461/001/HCal_Eff_Report.pdf slides]; | ** Zeke:[https://sbs.jlab.org/DocDB/0004/000461/001/HCal_Eff_Report.pdf slides]; | ||
| − | ** Anu: [https://sbs.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ | + | ** Anu: [https://sbs.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=462 slides]; |
* AOB | * AOB | ||
'''Minutes:''' | '''Minutes:''' | ||
| + | * Comments for Zeke: | ||
| + | ** Investigation of inelastic contamination in HCal efficiency studies??? | ||
| + | ** Binomial error is the "least wrong" error according to Andrew; (Quadratic Error is the least wrong according to David); | ||
| + | ** To reconcile MC and data estimations of HCal efficiency, one needs to estimate systematics; | ||
| + | ** Need uncertainty from the hypotheses involved in the estimation of efficiency => systematics | ||
| + | * Comments for Anu: | ||
| + | ** Need to investigate difference of photon energy between MC and data: database issue? | ||
| + | * Provakar: plot of SIMC elastic+ MC inelastic vs data | ||
Latest revision as of 11:29, 10 November 2023
Back to main analysis meeting page
Agenda:
Minutes:
- Comments for Zeke:
- Investigation of inelastic contamination in HCal efficiency studies???
- Binomial error is the "least wrong" error according to Andrew; (Quadratic Error is the least wrong according to David);
- To reconcile MC and data estimations of HCal efficiency, one needs to estimate systematics;
- Need uncertainty from the hypotheses involved in the estimation of efficiency => systematics
- Comments for Anu:
- Need to investigate difference of photon energy between MC and data: database issue?
- Provakar: plot of SIMC elastic+ MC inelastic vs data
